Compare repair and replacement
Use the quick comparison when both systems could last your chosen timeframe. If a repair would only buy a few years, open the replacement-later scenario below it. Enter complete quotes and annual heating, cooling, and maintenance costs for comparable comfort.
YOUR HOME · YOUR NUMBERS
Compare keeping your current system with a heat-pump replacement. Start with your quotes; add running costs if you have them. Your answers stay in this page and are not saved or sent with a request.
Would a repair buy you a few more years?
Compare repair now and replacement later with replacement today. These are separate scenarios from the quick comparison above. All answers stay on this page.
Start with the repair assessment
Ask what failed, what the repair covers, how the warranty changes your out-of-pocket cost, and how long the system might reasonably keep working. Equipment age is one reason to seek an evaluation, alongside frequent repairs and comfort problems. It does not establish a precise remaining life or force a replacement decision.
ENERGY STAR replacement guidance · Source checked 2026-09-06
A quick comparison with known running costs
For a hypothetical $15,000 replacement, $3,000 rebate, and $2,000 immediate repair, the extra upfront replacement cost is $10,000. Over ten years, replacement must save $1,000 per year to break even. If annual running costs are $2,400 for the existing system and $1,800 for the new one, repair totals $26,000 and replacement totals $30,000, assuming the repaired system lasts the full ten years.
What changes if the repair buys only three years?
Using those same costs, suppose replacement after three years costs $16,000 with no future rebate, and the later system also costs $1,800 per year to run. Repair now plus replacement later totals $37,800 over ten years, versus $30,000 for replacement today. The $7,800 difference depends on the future-price and service-life assumptions. The delayed purchase is counted at the end of year three.
Cash spent and remaining equipment value
The timing scenario compares cash spent over the same period. Replacing later leaves newer equipment at the end, and this remaining value is not included. Neither comparison includes borrowing charges, the time value of money, changing energy prices, or unexpected failures. Future rebates default to zero; today’s program may not exist when replacement becomes necessary.
Gather the costs before entering a scenario
Use the same comfort target and comparison period for every option. Start with these records:
- Written diagnosis and repair price after any confirmed warranty coverage.
- Complete replacement price, including required installation and site work.
- Confirmed incentive amount and whether the quote already deducts it.
- Supported annual running costs, or a decision to leave savings unknown.
- Your best-supported repair-life assumption and a separate scenario where it lasts less time.
Read the repair-or-replace decision guide for the questions to ask during the assessment. The calculator cannot establish the diagnosis or remaining service life.
Use replacement later when a repair only buys time
A repair can be worthwhile without lasting the entire comparison period. Enter the later replacement cost and timing explicitly instead of treating the repaired equipment as if it lasts indefinitely.
Test more than one timing assumption. Future equipment prices, future incentives, and future running costs are unknown, so label them as scenarios. Use zero for an unconfirmed future rebate. Compare cash needed now separately from total spending across the period.
Common question
What if I do not know the annual running costs?
Use the savings-needed result rather than inventing future bills. Ask what annual difference would make replacement break even, then seek evidence for whether that target is plausible. A result with unknown savings is a decision threshold, not proof that replacement will repay its cost.
Check the result before acting on it
Ask whether each scenario uses comparable comfort, complete prices, and a feasible equipment lifetime. A financially attractive repair is not an option if a qualified assessment finds it cannot restore appropriate operation. A low replacement figure is not comparable if it omits necessary work.
Keep warranties, cash availability, financing, disruption, and remaining equipment value alongside the model. Review a replacement quote before using its total to make a decision.
Editorial review: 2026-09-06
